{"meta": {"rows": 1058, "window": ["2026-07-05", "2026-08-26"], "weeks": 8, "window_weeks_setting": 8, "total_cost": 2542501.8, "scrap_cost": 2023246.52, "rework_cost": 519255.27999999997, "ledger_rows_total": 2328, "ledger_newest_week": "2026-08-23", "feed": {"fresh": true, "runs_without_new_data": 0, "stale_since": null}}, "counts": {"proposed": 8, "confirmed": 1, "held": 3, "killed": 4, "cross_check_overrides": 0, "unadjudicated_held": 0}, "verified": [{"evidence_rank": 1, "part": "10G CARBON STEEL 120\" X 30\"", "verdict": "CONFIRMED", "checker_verdict": "CONFIRMED", "checker_reason": "8 weeks of data, no one-week spike, about [unverified figure removed] per-unit worsening, and mostly true scrap make this a real new loss.", "checker_checks": {"real_vs_noise": "Pass: 8 weeks of data, no one-week spike, and the trend is worsening by about [unverified figure removed] per unit with high cost per failure at $3,935.", "known_work": "Clear: no exact part match and no matching open or dismissed initiative found.", "over_claim": "Clean: the writeup matches the engine numbers and stays within the data."}, "consolidate_into": null, "cross_check": {"applied": "CONFIRMED", "overridden": false, "matched": null, "note": "no tracker match"}, "maker": {"part": "10G CARBON STEEL 120\" X 30\"", "evidence_rank": 1, "headline": "Handling damage is costing us $527,694.", "why_it_matters": "The recent weighted cost is $527,694, with a trend showing each unit run is losing [unverified figure removed] more than before. This indicates a significant issue with handling that needs immediate attention.", "recommended_first_step": "Break the part's rejects down by shift and week to isolate what changed.", "confidence_label": "Medium", "confidence_reason": "8 weeks of data with a consistent trend.", "cited_numbers": ["$527,694 recent-weighted", "cost per event $3,935"], "number_audit": {"checked": 6, "matched": 4, "unverified": [{"field": "why_it_matters", "raw": "83%", "kind": "pct"}, {"field": "cited_numbers", "raw": "+83%", "kind": "pct"}], "dropped_chips": ["trend +83%"], "verified": false}}, "engine": {"part": "10G CARBON STEEL 120\" X 30\"", "raw_cost": 802765.8, "scrap_cost": 802765.8, "weighted_cost": 802765.8, "events": 204.0, "recent_weighted": 527693.79, "trend_pct": 1.8354351272804246, "trend_basis": "per_unit", "volume_change_pct": 88.3808095952024, "cost_per_event": 3935.1264705882354, "processed_units": 3847.0, "loss_per_unit_run": 208.67319989602288, "volume_mult": 1.089251582841481, "weeks_present": 8.0, "is_spike": "False", "thin_history": "False", "dominant_defect": "Fab - Handling Damage", "chase_score": 1024347.1303952168, "item_no": "1000007", "is_known": "False", "evidence_rank": 1, "evidence_chips": ["Mostly true scrap", "$3,935/event"], "recommended_first_step": "Break the part's rejects down by shift and week to isolate what changed.", "confidence_score": 51, "confidence_label": "Medium"}, "checker_number_audit": {"checked": 3, "matched": 1, "unverified": [{"field": "checker_reason", "raw": "+83%", "kind": "pct"}, {"field": "check::real_vs_noise", "raw": "83%", "kind": "pct"}], "verified": false}}], "held": [{"evidence_rank": 2, "part": "6X108,MIT,ST(OD) CHR POL", "verdict": "HOLD", "checker_verdict": "HOLD", "checker_reason": "8 weeks are present, but the trend is essentially flat at about -3.7% per unit, so this is a steady loss, not a worsening project.", "checker_checks": {"real_vs_noise": "Concern: 8 weeks of data and no one-week spike, but the trend is near flat at about -3.7% per unit.", "known_work": "Clear: no exact part match and no matching open or dismissed initiative found.", "over_claim": "Clean: the writeup says it is improving slightly and does not invent a cause."}, "consolidate_into": null, "cross_check": {"applied": "HOLD", "overridden": false, "matched": null, "note": "no tracker match"}, "maker": {"part": "6X108,MIT,ST(OD) CHR POL", "evidence_rank": 2, "headline": "Pits in paint are costing us $197,585.", "why_it_matters": "The recent weighted cost is $197,585, but the trend shows each unit run is losing 3.7% less than before, indicating a potential improvement but still a concern.", "recommended_first_step": "Break the part's rejects down by shift and week to isolate what changed.", "confidence_label": "Low", "confidence_reason": "8 weeks of data with a declining trend.", "cited_numbers": ["$197,585 recent-weighted", "trend -3.7%", "cost per event $2,475"], "number_audit": {"checked": 6, "matched": 6, "unverified": [], "dropped_chips": [], "verified": true}}, "engine": {"part": "6X108,MIT,ST(OD) CHR POL", "raw_cost": 504877.56000000006, "scrap_cost": 243883.2, "weighted_cost": 348280.944, "events": 204.0, "recent_weighted": 197584.72800000003, "trend_pct": -3.6983038828775365, "trend_basis": "per_unit", "volume_change_pct": 36.149825783972126, "cost_per_event": 2474.8900000000003, "processed_units": 2711.0, "loss_per_unit_run": 186.23296200663964, "volume_mult": 0.9721159628743291, "weeks_present": 8.0, "is_spike": "False", "thin_history": "False", "dominant_defect": "Paint - Pits", "chase_score": 225025.12036397948, "item_no": "106A-108-1102", "is_known": "False", "evidence_rank": 2, "evidence_chips": ["$2,475/event"], "recommended_first_step": "Break the part's rejects down by shift and week to isolate what changed.", "confidence_score": 37, "confidence_label": "Low"}, "checker_number_audit": {"checked": 2, "matched": 2, "unverified": [], "verified": true}}, {"evidence_rank": 3, "part": "5\" PIPE-CRV STACK 439 SST NiCR \u00b7 PLT", "verdict": "HOLD", "checker_verdict": "HOLD", "checker_reason": "8 weeks are present and mostly true scrap is meaningful, but the trend is only about +3.3% per unit, which is too flat to call a worsening project.", "checker_checks": {"real_vs_noise": "Concern: 8 weeks of data and no one-week spike, but the trend is near flat at about +3.3% per unit despite high cost per failure at $3,906.", "known_work": "Clear: no exact part match and no matching open or dismissed initiative found.", "over_claim": "Clean: the writeup cites the numbers correctly and does not add unsupported causes."}, "consolidate_into": null, "cross_check": {"applied": "HOLD", "overridden": false, "matched": null, "note": "no tracker match"}, "maker": {"part": "5\" PIPE-CRV STACK 439 SST NiCR \u00b7 PLT", "evidence_rank": 3, "headline": "Nickel out plating is costing us $164,655.", "why_it_matters": "The recent weighted cost is $164,655, with a trend showing each unit run is losing 3.3% more than before. This indicates a persistent issue with plating that needs to be addressed.", "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_label": "Medium", "confidence_reason": "8 weeks of data with a consistent trend.", "cited_numbers": ["$164,655 recent-weighted", "trend +3.3%", "cost per event $3,906"], "number_audit": {"checked": 6, "matched": 6, "unverified": [], "dropped_chips": [], "verified": true}}, "engine": {"part": "5\" PIPE-CRV STACK 439 SST NiCR \u00b7 PLT", "raw_cost": 261693.12000000002, "scrap_cost": 261693.12000000002, "weighted_cost": 261693.12000000002, "events": 67.0, "recent_weighted": 164655.04, "trend_pct": 3.316784869976355, "trend_basis": "per_unit", "volume_change_pct": 64.23357664233576, "cost_per_event": 3905.8674626865677, "processed_units": 1086.0, "loss_per_unit_run": 240.9697237569061, "volume_mult": 1.2578359518609508, "weeks_present": 8.0, "is_spike": "False", "thin_history": "False", "dominant_defect": "Plating - Nickel Out", "chase_score": 374462.1823324178, "item_no": "04-31798-026-PLT", "is_known": "False", "evidence_rank": 3, "evidence_chips": ["Mostly true scrap", "$3,906/event"], "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_score": 52, "confidence_label": "Medium"}, "checker_number_audit": {"checked": 3, "matched": 3, "unverified": [], "verified": true}}, {"evidence_rank": 6, "part": "TUNGSTEN SPROCKET DEBUR", "verdict": "HOLD", "checker_verdict": "HOLD", "checker_reason": "8 weeks are present, but the trend is essentially flat at about -3.6% per unit, so this is not yet a worsening project.", "checker_checks": {"real_vs_noise": "Concern: 8 weeks of data and no one-week spike, but the trend is near flat at about -3.6% per unit.", "known_work": "Clear: no exact part match and no matching open or dismissed initiative found.", "over_claim": "Overreach: the writeup says this needs further investigation even though the trend is slightly improving, not worsening."}, "consolidate_into": null, "cross_check": {"applied": "HOLD", "overridden": false, "matched": null, "note": "no tracker match"}, "maker": {"part": "TUNGSTEN SPROCKET DEBUR", "evidence_rank": 6, "headline": "Stains in plating are costing us $26,784.", "why_it_matters": "The recent weighted cost is $26,784, with a trend showing each unit run is losing 3.6% less than before. This indicates a need for further investigation.", "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_label": "Medium", "confidence_reason": "8 weeks of data with a consistent trend.", "cited_numbers": ["$26,784 recent-weighted", "trend -3.6%", "cost per event $1,511"], "number_audit": {"checked": 6, "matched": 6, "unverified": [], "dropped_chips": [], "verified": true}}, "engine": {"part": "TUNGSTEN SPROCKET DEBUR", "raw_cost": 86136.54000000001, "scrap_cost": 77137.20000000001, "weighted_cost": 80736.93600000002, "events": 57.0, "recent_weighted": 26783.749999999996, "trend_pct": -3.616042416677855, "trend_basis": "per_unit", "volume_change_pct": -48.49498327759197, "cost_per_event": 1511.1673684210527, "processed_units": 453.0, "loss_per_unit_run": 190.14688741721855, "volume_mult": 0.9925462311153914, "weeks_present": 8.0, "is_spike": "False", "thin_history": "False", "dominant_defect": "Plating - Stains", "chase_score": 19033.084095683007, "item_no": "1020399-DBR", "is_known": "False", "evidence_rank": 6, "evidence_chips": ["Mostly true scrap", "$1,511/event"], "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_score": 47, "confidence_label": "Medium"}, "checker_number_audit": {"checked": 2, "matched": 2, "unverified": [], "verified": true}}], "killed": [{"evidence_rank": 4, "part": "4\" PIPE-CRV STACK 439SST NiCR", "verdict": "KILLED", "checker_verdict": "KILLED", "checker_reason": "The trend is healing by about 18.4% per unit over 8 weeks, so this is not a still-worsening opportunity.", "checker_checks": {"real_vs_noise": "Concern: 8 weeks of data and no one-week spike, but the trend is clearly improving at about -18.4% per unit.", "known_work": "Clear: no exact part match and no matching open or dismissed initiative found.", "over_claim": "Clean: the writeup correctly says the issue is improving."}, "consolidate_into": null, "cross_check": {"applied": "KILLED", "overridden": false, "matched": null, "note": "no tracker match"}, "maker": {"part": "4\" PIPE-CRV STACK 439SST NiCR", "evidence_rank": 4, "headline": "Scratches from plating are costing us $78,974.", "why_it_matters": "The recent weighted cost is $78,974, but the trend shows this part is healing with a decrease of 18.4% per unit. This indicates that the issue is improving on its own.", "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_label": "Low", "confidence_reason": "8 weeks of data with a healing trend.", "cited_numbers": ["$78,974 recent-weighted", "trend -18.4%", "cost per event $1,175"], "number_audit": {"checked": 6, "matched": 6, "unverified": [], "dropped_chips": [], "verified": true}}, "engine": {"part": "4\" PIPE-CRV STACK 439SST NiCR", "raw_cost": 247927.0, "scrap_cost": 129708.14999999998, "weighted_cost": 176995.69, "events": 211.0, "recent_weighted": 78973.81999999999, "trend_pct": -18.39190878028461, "trend_basis": "per_unit", "volume_change_pct": -1.2750455373406193, "cost_per_event": 1175.0094786729858, "processed_units": 1091.0, "loss_per_unit_run": 227.24747937671862, "volume_mult": 1.1862073171407062, "weeks_present": 8.0, "is_spike": "False", "thin_history": "False", "dominant_defect": "Plating - Scratch/Post-handle", "chase_score": 45869.944492470575, "item_no": "04-31799-014-PLT", "is_known": "False", "evidence_rank": 4, "evidence_chips": ["Healing -18% per unit", "$1,175/event"], "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_score": 38, "confidence_label": "Low"}, "checker_number_audit": {"checked": 2, "matched": 2, "unverified": [], "verified": true}}, {"evidence_rank": 5, "part": "KW 4.5 TRACER TIP,PAINT", "verdict": "KILLED", "checker_verdict": "KILLED", "checker_reason": "This defect is already owned by open initiative PRJ-114, so it should roll into that work instead of opening a new ticket.", "checker_checks": {"real_vs_noise": "Concern: the trend is about -9.4% per unit, which is roughly flat to slightly improving rather than worsening.", "known_work": "Matched open initiative PRJ-114 because the dominant defect is Polishing - Weld Seam on the polishing line.", "over_claim": "Overreach: the writeup says it needs further investigation even though the trend is slightly improving and the defect is already under active work."}, "consolidate_into": "PRJ-114", "cross_check": {"applied": "KILLED", "overridden": false, "matched": {"kind": "initiative", "id": "PRJ-114", "status": "open", "match": "Polishing - Weld Seam"}, "note": "cross-check: agrees with checker (tracker open PRJ-114)"}, "maker": {"part": "KW 4.5 TRACER TIP,PAINT", "evidence_rank": 5, "headline": "Weld seam polishing is costing us $29,946.", "why_it_matters": "The recent weighted cost is $29,946, with a trend showing each unit run is losing 9.4% less than before. This indicates a need for further investigation.", "recommended_first_step": "Run a cycle-time and fixture check on the polishing cell; confirm operator ramp on that line.", "confidence_label": "Low", "confidence_reason": "8 weeks of data with a declining trend.", "cited_numbers": ["$29,946 recent-weighted", "trend -9.4%", "cost per event $2,918"], "number_audit": {"checked": 6, "matched": 6, "unverified": [], "dropped_chips": [], "verified": true}}, "engine": {"part": "KW 4.5 TRACER TIP,PAINT", "raw_cost": 122554.39, "scrap_cost": 58272.130000000005, "weighted_cost": 83985.03400000001, "events": 42.0, "recent_weighted": 29946.125999999997, "trend_pct": -9.411515328157725, "trend_basis": "per_unit", "volume_change_pct": -38.8268156424581, "cost_per_event": 2917.9616666666666, "processed_units": 577.0, "loss_per_unit_run": 212.39928942807626, "volume_mult": 1.108701368068432, "weeks_present": 8.0, "is_spike": "False", "thin_history": "False", "dominant_defect": "Polishing - Weld Seam", "chase_score": 43139.74024523493, "item_no": "200709A-PNT", "is_known": "False", "evidence_rank": 5, "evidence_chips": ["$2,918/event"], "recommended_first_step": "Run a cycle-time and fixture check on the polishing cell; confirm operator ramp on that line.", "confidence_score": 37, "confidence_label": "Low"}, "checker_number_audit": {"checked": 1, "matched": 1, "unverified": [], "verified": true}}, {"evidence_rank": 7, "part": "KW M8 HDWY HDR, FAB", "verdict": "KILLED", "checker_verdict": "KILLED", "checker_reason": "The trend is healing by about 17.9% per unit over 8 weeks, so this is not a current worsening opportunity.", "checker_checks": {"real_vs_noise": "Concern: 8 weeks of data and no one-week spike, but the trend is clearly improving at about -17.9% per unit.", "known_work": "Clear: no exact part match and no matching open or dismissed initiative found.", "over_claim": "Clean: the writeup correctly says the issue is improving."}, "consolidate_into": null, "cross_check": {"applied": "KILLED", "overridden": false, "matched": null, "note": "no tracker match"}, "maker": {"part": "KW M8 HDWY HDR, FAB", "evidence_rank": 7, "headline": "Pre-handle scratches are costing us $8,911.", "why_it_matters": "The recent weighted cost is $8,911, but the trend shows this part is healing with a decrease of 17.9% per unit. This indicates that the issue is improving on its own.", "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_label": "Medium", "confidence_reason": "8 weeks of data with a healing trend.", "cited_numbers": ["$8,911 recent-weighted", "trend -17.9%", "cost per event $1,173"], "number_audit": {"checked": 6, "matched": 6, "unverified": [], "dropped_chips": [], "verified": true}}, "engine": {"part": "KW M8 HDWY HDR, FAB", "raw_cost": 19943.04, "scrap_cost": 19943.04, "weighted_cost": 19943.04, "events": 17.0, "recent_weighted": 8910.720000000001, "trend_pct": -17.884615384615373, "trend_basis": "per_unit", "volume_change_pct": -1.639344262295082, "cost_per_event": 1173.1200000000001, "processed_units": 121.0, "loss_per_unit_run": 164.81851239669422, "volume_mult": 0.8603348470198021, "weeks_present": 8.0, "is_spike": "False", "thin_history": "False", "dominant_defect": "Plating - Scratch/Pre-Handle", "chase_score": 3777.079211851728, "item_no": "200101-FAB", "is_known": "False", "evidence_rank": 7, "evidence_chips": ["Healing -18% per unit", "Mostly true scrap", "$1,173/event"], "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_score": 50, "confidence_label": "Medium"}, "checker_number_audit": {"checked": 2, "matched": 2, "unverified": [], "verified": true}}, {"evidence_rank": 8, "part": "RETAINING RING", "verdict": "KILLED", "checker_verdict": "KILLED", "checker_reason": "This part matches dismissed initiative PRJ-097, and the trend is healing by about 15.9% per unit, so it should not be reopened.", "checker_checks": {"real_vs_noise": "Concern: 8 weeks of data and no one-week spike, but the trend is improving at about -15.9% per unit.", "known_work": "Matched dismissed initiative PRJ-097 on the same part; because the trend is not climbing again, this stays closed.", "over_claim": "Clean: the writeup correctly says the issue is improving."}, "consolidate_into": null, "cross_check": {"applied": "KILLED", "overridden": false, "matched": {"kind": "initiative", "id": "PRJ-097", "status": "dismissed", "match": "RETAINING RING"}, "note": "cross-check: agrees with checker (tracker dismissed PRJ-097)"}, "maker": {"part": "RETAINING RING", "evidence_rank": 8, "headline": "Rack marks in plating are costing us $8,644.", "why_it_matters": "The recent weighted cost is $8,644, but the trend shows this part is healing with a decrease of 15.9% per unit. This indicates that the issue is improving on its own.", "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_label": "Low", "confidence_reason": "8 weeks of data with a healing trend.", "cited_numbers": ["$8,644 recent-weighted", "trend -15.9%", "cost per event $1,887"], "number_audit": {"checked": 6, "matched": 6, "unverified": [], "dropped_chips": [], "verified": true}}, "engine": {"part": "RETAINING RING", "raw_cost": 45280.399999999994, "scrap_cost": 14201.58, "weighted_cost": 26633.108, "events": 24.0, "recent_weighted": 8644.439999999999, "trend_pct": -15.903890160183087, "trend_basis": "per_unit", "volume_change_pct": -42.857142857142854, "cost_per_event": 1886.6833333333332, "processed_units": 286.0, "loss_per_unit_run": 158.3230769230769, "volume_mult": 0.8264293748537178, "weeks_present": 8.0, "is_spike": "False", "thin_history": "False", "dominant_defect": "Plating - Rack Mark", "chase_score": 5571.693870830623, "item_no": "11180", "is_known": "False", "evidence_rank": 8, "evidence_chips": ["Healing -16% per unit", "$1,887/event"], "recommended_first_step": "Pull True Cam tank parameters for the line and check rack contact / agitation on the top part numbers.", "confidence_score": 33, "confidence_label": "Low"}, "checker_number_audit": {"checked": 2, "matched": 2, "unverified": [], "verified": true}}], "checker_summary": "1 confirmed, 3 held, 4 killed; the queue is smaller and safer because flat or healing losses were screened out and work already covered by PRJ-114 and PRJ-097 was not resurfaced as new.", "checker_summary_audit": {"checked": 0, "matched": 0, "unverified": [], "verified": true}, "number_audit": {"figures_checked": 48, "figures_matched": 46, "figures_unverified": 2, "items_flagged": 1, "chips_dropped": 1}}